About Me

Name: Anthony
Location: Arvada, CO
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Health Care and Bishop Conley

Bishop James Conley, auxiliary for the Archdiocese of Denver, has a peice today in First Things.  Because of the legislative action scheduled for tomorrow, the perspective of the Catholic bishops is important.  For at least this bishop, the current discussion has failed.
  
"With more than 620 Catholic hospitals serving the public around the United States, hundreds of Catholic medical clinics and shelters, and even a few Catholic-affiliated medical schools, Catholics have a keen interest in healthcare reform. That interest isn’t new. It’s rooted in experience, including the experience of trying to help people with little or no health insurance at all. For decades, the U.S. bishops have pushed for an overhaul of our nation’s healthcare industry and the way it delivers its services. Why? Because the Church sees access to basic health care as a right and a social responsibility, not a privilege.

"But Catholic support for the general principle of reform does not bind anyone to endorse a specific piece of legislation. God gave us brains for a reason, to think; and we need to use them, because the practical and moral problems we face on the way to good healthcare reform are as formidable as the goal is admirable. This is why the U.S. bishops’ conference has tried so diligently for the past three months to work with Congress and the White House in seeking sound compromise legislation. As of November 5, all those efforts have failed."
Read the rest at http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2009/11/a-healthcare-problem-washington-may-have-missed
Tags: healthcare  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

American Culture and Religion

People of faith are trying to have their voices heard in any number of debates which will deeply impact our society, including the debate on how we will provide for healthcare.   Yet their voices seem muted and not taken seriously by those legislating.  What will the impact be on our culture if these voices are not heard?
 
The separation of Church and State has caused many to believe that people of faith are not suppose to share their ideas in the public square.  The presumption is that it is automatically an imposition of religious belief if a religious person tries to bring faith informed values to the table.   There is also the assumption that anyone with religious and moral convictions is somehow less rational than those without such things.  But it is normally the irreligious and immoral who destroy cultures and societies.  The fact is if moral and religious people remain silent in the public square, other voices impose their irrational values on everyone. 
 
When moral convictions must rely on only limited human experience, they can not rise above the imagination or popular convention.  This is why the most important voices against slavery often rooted their convictions, if not in the Lord as revealed in the Christian faith, at least in God as he is manifest in that Divine Providence which most Americans understood guided their national aspirations. 
 
To flourish and advance basic human rights, American culture relies on the moral voice of people of faith.   Convictions that grow out of man's encounter with the Living God give life to societies because such convictions are not limited to the merely imaginable.  Their force of strength and long term benefits can not be calculated or manipulated.   Such convictions are always over and above any limiting status quo. 
 
Our current administration and Congress seem to see religious convictions as either a threat or something to be manipulated.  They show a propensity not to respect people of faith.  Whether out of a certain hubris or some other form of elitism, some members of the administration and of Congress give the impression of patronizing, even going so far as to seem to be telling people of faith what they ought to believe.  At least this is the way I feel about the current healthcare debate - a debate which regardless of outcome, will have great bearing on American society and culture for years to come. 
 
The moral convictions of people of faith (whether these concern the unborn, the gift of sexuality, the dying, the moral freedom of healthcare workers) all seem to have fallen on deaf ears.  Such convictions inconvienently prolong the conversation, add distracting twists and turns to the implimentation of some sort of agenda.  But how is this agenda serving basic human rights when the most important voice for human rights in our Nation's history has come from men and women of faith?  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Debate

The truth about healthcare in America is becoming clearer. It is not simply a decision between delivery systems - which one is the best.  It is really about a mix of moral principles, funding and personal freedom. We are gaining insight into the kinds of liberties and moral values at stake. Thankfully our government is designed to be inefficient so that debate on important issues can come out. In this case, a better understanding of the dignity of the human person - the right to life from womb to tomb - has come to the fore.
 
Bishop Nickless unpacks the Catholic position on Healthcare at http://bit.ly/Z9sCV. He is very concerned that the poor and underprivileged have access to good healthcare. He notes, however, that the current House version of the Bill fails to meet two out of four necessary moral criteria. He charges that it is written so as to permit the funding of abortion and euthanasia, as well as mandate preventive medicine. Abortion and Euthenasia are directly contrary to the dignity of human life. As good as preventive care is, governments always end up diminishing the dignity and freewill of their citizens when they attempt to legislate personal morality. This means that the current bill is basically immoral.

What is the specific moral problem? Rush Limbaugh, who acknowledges our current system does not adequately address catastrophic accidents and diseases, is very concerned that the current legislation fundamentally changes the relationship of the government to the citizens. Legislators, he contends, will come to see their constituents as budget items engaged in a dialectic that must be moderated. As a consequence, future legislative battles will pit Americans against one another as each of us scrambles to secure from our elected representatives our own piece of the pie when it comes to healthcare. We will see each other as potential enemies who threaten the quality of health care we think we deserve. The government would have the new role of attempting to moderate this life and death struggle. His point is as soon as a government sees citizens as competing budget items that must be moderated, it sees its role as controlling citizens rather than serving them. Against this dialectic, he is concerned about our right to liberty. Similarly, Hugh Hewitt raises questions about whether we really want government panels making "rulings" over our bodies. See http://tinyurl.com/pk4owq.

On a related point, socialized medicine seems to be dangerous because of the overall moral condition of our society.  Secular governments often apply the most twisted moral rationale to various immoral medical practices. This is because emotions and money rather than reason and sound principles are applied to the questions at hand. When this is the case, whether the plan is managed by private insurance or else by the government, it can only lead to the most unethical of practices.
 
The healthcare debate needs to become a conversation that recaptures solid moral reasoning and sound principles in making healthcare decisions.  Without agreed on principles and the commitment to be morally rational, the panels will be constantly pressured by political voices to choose the most cost effective way of distributing tax dollars to the most aggressive advocates of any health issue.  This could bode ill for the poor and most vulnerable of our society.   In our society, we have disagreements concerning the fundamental dignity of human life.  Many of our fellow citizens look on abortion and euthenasia as human rights that trump life itself. This makes placing healthcare rulings into the hands of law makers or their appointees a naive way to go.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Gates Family and The Carmelites

The Carmelites who make Mystic Monk Coffee were trying to secure land in Wyoming for a new monastery.   A new community with an explosion of vocations needed a quiet space for their anonymous way of life dedicated to communion with God and interceding for the salvation of the world.   They had been working for years to secure a piece of property for precisely this purpose.  They found some beautiful acreage conducive to a life of discipline and prayer.  They believed that somehow this was part of God's plan for them.  But then, things did not fall together the way they had hoped.  After struggling to secure financing, Bill Gates bought it out from under them.  See http://bit.ly/pZnUg.

Contemplative life in America has had a rocky road.  Most people, even Catholics, do not see any value in it.   It does not produce very much.  If it benefits the mission of the Church, it is not because it is the source of successful parish or missionary programs.   Its fruits are hidden.  But contemplative life is good for society - it helps a civilization stay civilized because it reminds us of the goodness and beauty of humanity.  Without such a reminder, America runs the risk of being dehumanized. 

Monks would say that it is precisely because their way of life is hidden and lowly that God uses it for great good.   In my own experience of monks, I have found contemplative life a school of human authenticity where men and women discover who they really are and learn how to love God and themselves, for God's own sake.  It is an anti-materialistic, anti-consumerist enterprise.  Entrepreneurs and business men must be baffled by it.  This is why I am not sure that Bill Gates fully realized he was depriving America of when he bought the land out from under these holy men.

There is so much beautiful country that would benefit from the stewardship that monastic communities are able to provide.  A few years ago, the movie Into Great Silence showed us the human and natural beauty of living a life dedicated to God. (see http://www.decentfilms.com/sections/articles/groning.html)  The film by Philip Groning depicted the monks of the Grande Chartreuse - a nine hundred year old monastery in the Carthusian Mountains above Grenoble, France.  The splendor of nature integrated with a peaceful life dedicated to God struck a chord in the hearts of those who were spellbound by the two hour and forty-five minute mostly silent film.  I was present at three showings, packed, where no one moved even after the film ended.  And, to the surprise of even the Carthusians, the film was held over in theatres across Europe and America. 

The Grande Chartreuse is part of the history of Europe and France, because it informed the European consciousness with a noble idea of what it means to be human.  Namely, the most important things in life are not found in material success, commercialism or having control over the lives of others.  Humanity does not exist simply to produce things and to fight.  Instead, humanity is an end in itself - it is good for its own sake because God made it that way.  Men and women can live in harmony with God, one another and with nature - and when they do, it is beautiful.    Monasteries, like the one the Carmelites want to found in Wyoming, are living icons of this truth.

For the size of the American continent and for the centuries it has been civilized, there are not very many monasteries or places of prayer.  The contemplative vocation requires a space that is silent and beautiful.  This is because monks and nuns normally do not leave their monasteries for any length of time.  They live a quiet simple life, day in and day out, training their hearts away from the noise and distractions that often drowned out the voice of God.  In our loud industrial post modern society, this requires a large amount of land in remote areas.  While our country has dedicated a significant portion of land to national parks and forests, Americans do not typically think about dedicating large portions of land for religious purposes.  For this reason, we remain largely deprived of any contemplative dimension to our culture. 

Mr. and Mrs. Gates have established themselves as philanthropists in many ways.  Now they have an opportunity to contribute to something that may well contribute to our way of life for a millennium.  If Into Great Silence is any indication, helping the Carmelites establish their monastery is a contribution that will help America remember its humanity.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Medjugorje

Sadly enough, another scandal regarding a priest unfaithful to his vows has hit the media.  His involvement with the visionaries of Bosnia has cast a shadow over the whole phenomenon.  Some reports now suggest that he contrived the whole affair, and that the people of Medjugorje used the whole thing for profit.  To these charges and the disciplinary actions of the Church, I can say nothing.  I can only ponder these events against my own experience over twenty years ago.  If you are aware of other accounts of recent events, please let me know.  Up to now, my sources for this story are:  
http://tiny.cc/dDmdt

My visit there in Easter 1986 was a beautiful experience for many reasons, not the least of which was the witness of the Catholics of that little small town.  We stayed in the farmhouse of Nedo and his family.  Heart warming meals were prepared on a wood burning stove.  We considered ourselves lucky because we had indoor plumbing - not all the members of our group had this luxury.  It was about a mile to the village itself and walking in that countryside was beautiful.  Old Croatian peasants could be seen tending small flocks of sheep.  Tiny little fields of tabocco and other cash crops were tucked in around the houses.  If they were Christian, people greeted one another with "Thanks be to Jesus and Mary," and if communist, "Good Day."

What was most memorable for me was the faith of the peasants.  Here we were in a poor communist country with none of the conveniences of our own and the little parish Church was packed for the whole Easter Triduum.  It was not simply pilgrms who filled the little church, but the locals.  Weather beaten faces and fierce eyes of determination: these were men and women who knew how to endure persecution, for whom the cost of discipleship was deeply felt.   They were watched and spied on by a government that did nto respect their way of life or family values.  But they did not despair.  Like the generations in that little valley had done before them, they turned to God.  Some walked for miles everyday to participate in the liturgies of Holy Week.  Most of them came from families where the fathers and older brothers had to be gone months at a time to work in factories in Russia or Eastern Germany.  Yet for the days before Easter it seemed like many of those fathers and brothers were able to make it back to pray with their families.  Nedo was one of these.  After the services, some of which would last into the night, most everyone would walk back to their houses.  I do not remember very many cars. 
 
One of my favorite memories was gathering illegally in the basement of a farm house with some members of their local youth group.   I was with a group of students from Franciscan University of Steubenville.  They liked the worship music we sang and so we quietly prayed together.  Just before we were to depart, they said they wanted to sing one more song.  With tears in their eyes, they softly intoned the Battle Hymn of the Republic, in their own language.  Any lingering fear of the authorities gave way to a deep sense of courage as we joined together with them "Glory, Glory, Halleluia!"
 
That apocalyptic song which roused the defenders of our own Republic at a dark time in our history joined us together for a few moments strengthening our bonds of friendship and unity of faith.   It was before the fall of communism that would allow them to meet together freely to pray. This was before the civil war that would rock their country.  I do not know whether very many of those young people we prayed with are still alive.  But I do know their witness and the witness of their parents strengthened me and helped me to understand the hope which faith in God can give.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Classy New Archbishop

Dominican Augustine DiNoia was recently consecrated Archbishop and appointed to oversee the Congregation on Divine Worship.   This post is normally fulfilled by a liturgist - someone specialized in the liturgy itself.  Archbishop DiNoia however is an accomplished dogmatic theologian.  Some think that this means Pope Benedict wants God not man to be the focus of Catholic Worship, that the work of promoting the liturgy requires the theological vision that dogmatic theology provides.  Perhaps Archbishop's comments at the end of this liturgy suggest as much.  Rather than going through a list of individuals to thank for helping to make the beautiful day of his consecration possible - the new Archbishop thanked God, the Church, the Holy See, and the Dominican Order which he entrusted to the intercession of the Virgin Mary.  "Its to God the glory belongs" he explained. 

It is difficult to capture the appropriatness of his words - except that one priest whispered to another "Now that's classy."  For some excerpts from the homily preached that day - go to:
http://tiny.cc/M5fLy
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Robert Royal and the Trail of JP II

This is a fun piece about the hieghts and insipid depths of Catholicism in our time -- I was with Dr. Royal when he followed the footsteps of JP II in Colorado during a seminar at Camp St. Malo.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Renewing the Vision of Religious Life

The great secret for renewing America is rediscovering our love for God.   Some courageous women have taken this up.  For those who did not get to listen to the interview last week -- Here is Hugh Hewitt, Sr. Prudence and Mother Regina Marie -
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Islam and Christianity

A Coptic Priest is winning converts to Christianity from Muslims.  How?  By explaining on live TV what Islamic texts actually say about Muslims.  Father Zakaria Botros gives a sobering interview  - http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026462.php
Check out his website: http://www.Islam-Christianity.net.

The Coptic Church has given a good example to all of us about the power of the Gospel of Christ.  His brother was murdered and he was imprisoned for this effort - now they want to kill him.  But he keeps on going, in season and out of season.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Revisiting the Vision and Hugh Hewitt Today

 
TODAY, 4 pm: Hugh Hewitt to air interview with local religious sister

June 3, 2009 - Today, Wednesday, June 3 from 4 to 5 p.m., the Hugh Hewitt Radio Show on 710 AM will air the complete recorded interview with Sister Mary Prudence Allen, a Religious Sister of Mercy of Alma, Mich. who currently teaches at the Denver archdiocese’s St. John Vianney Theological Seminary in Denver.  Sister Prudence is co-author of the new book, Foundations of Religious Life: Revisiting the Vision. (click here to read more)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Religious leaders, the President, and Societal Violence

Archbishop Chaput and Bishop Conley as well as many other bishops have expressed their concerns over the cold blooded murder of Dr. Tiller http://tinyurl.com/pjltwe. Their statement is very important because it calls the Catholics of Colorado to prayer, the most powerful response to senseless violence.  Their statement also implies a concern about the kind of culture we are fostering in our country and the destructiveness of violence to our community.   It is the kind of statement that religious leaders are able to effectively make - the kind of statement that provides an opportunity for all of us to examine our conscience and think about how we treat one another.      

The concerned response of these Catholic bishops differs greatly from the response of our president.   The president unjustly admonishes pro-life activists http://tiny.cc/EbLdx implying that those who stand for life stand in support of the actions of a deranged socio-path.   It is very sad that we have a leader who in a moment of crisis would recklessly imply that rational and peaceful pro-life citizens were in anyway associated with or even supportive of the cold blooded killing of another.  There is way too much violence in our society already - and all people of goodwill know this.  By why the president's reckless rhetoric? 

American Catholic signals an alarm in its criticism of Mr. Obama's response and the liberal blog-o-sphere http://tiny.cc/fcZLD; the assumptions and associations left-wing activists make are rash and contentious.  There is no attempt to carefully evaluate facts.  Instead there is an instant jump to ill founded conclusions.  What has possessed the President of the United States to endorse such a view of the problem is very troubling. 

But this rashness is about more than the President.  This is even true of Catholic liberal leaders like Dr. Whelan   http://tinyurl.com/pwjkko who strongly admonishes those who stand against abortion for their rhetoric - with the unfounded assumption that it does society harm to identify those who support abortion rights as in fact pro-abortion.   Here, Dr. Whelan makes a dangerous mistake.  To say someone is pro-abortion does not impugne evil motives - it is straight forward and clarifies what the issue of disagreement actually is.  What promotes violence in society is rather that kind of rhetoric the imputes evil motives through reckless and ambiguous assertions.  This is detraction and it leads to rash judgment.  Dr. Whelan recklessly detracts from the good reputation of very faithful and honest citizens while admonishing them in a spirit of righteous indignation.  

It is as if some have already judged as evil everyone who loves babies and finally their the opportunity to impugne these baby lovers with the most vile motives is at hand.  Sadly, human nature is inclined to such rashness.  We abhor the thought that our opponents might be a little bigger and better than the straw men and women we believe them to be.   Giving into this inclination (whoever the opponent and whatever the cause) never advances the human communtiy but leaves us more vulnerable to strife.  

There are those who vocally advocate a social agenda - correctly identifying what they say they want to advance is not making a rash judgment.  In fact, there are also whole schools of thought that believe purposefully promoting and acting on such rashness can be used for social change.  These schools work because we have lost sight of what a genuinely peaceful society really is.  Western atheistic and fanatical islamic thought is full of thinkers who believe society is advanced by rashness, contention and strife.   Fear of differences, the desire for order, righteous indignation and resentment collide in a social crisis, and the crafty know that advancing an agenda that promises to satisfy all these tumultous appetites will be tolerated even if it includes the persecution and oppression of certain voices in society.  They mistake a peaceful society with a social comfort hedged in by fear.  This is why, for those who espouse various forms of dialectic materialism (consumerist or religious), societal chaos is such a tempting opportunity.  In the face of chaos, a culture of comfortable fear is deemed acceptable.  This kind of thinking was utilized not only by 20th Century totalitarians to promote national socialism, it is also current with some radical islamic leaders.  There are even those who see the current crisis in social order brought on by the actions of a socio-path as an opportunity for societal change that should not be wasted.  Sadly, not only the cold blooded murder itself but also Obama's remarks play right into this kind of social agenda.

What is sad is the only social order that derives from this is one founded in fear and oppresion - and ultimately this can only be an evil social order.  Evil is incapable of advancing the good.  A culture of fearful comfort cannot of itself inspire human greatness or noble achievement.   This is because fear is not commensurate with the dignity of man.  Instead, history shows societies ruled by fear develop an atrocious banality: the despair of goodness robs individuals of their own sense of dignity and self-worth.   Men and women no longer live - they exist for reasons too small for them to comprehend.  Such a culture of death kills the human spirit and damns society to a living hell.

Promoting a culture of life is needed now more than ever and violence has no place in such a society.  This is why the bishop's statements are so important.  They know that how dangerous the fruits of villianizing ones opponents and acting on a rhetoric of unfounded accusation.  They know that a wholesome society requires an unrelenting participation in a social dialogue committed to the humble pursuit of the truth.  True community requires the discipline of renouncing all forms of rash judgment and contention, not only by individuals but also by the community itself.  It requires the courage to respect one another's dignity and the readiness to see the good in someone, even if you disagree with them.   Promoting life requires hope in everyone's humanity, even those who oppose such a noble effort.  To be pro-life is not merely a commitment to a social agenda: it is above all a commitment to the goodness and dignity of life itself. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Irrational Atheism v.s. the the Church - Mexico wins!

"Long live Christ the King" are the last words of a modern martyr. Padre Miguel Pro SJ's witness shows the greatness of our religion and the irrational pettiness of a society that sets itself against God and religion. At the time, the Mexican leader Plutarco Calles enforced laws against the Catholic Church. Mass, confession and even praying the rosary were all punishable offenses. To protect the clergy as far as possible, bishops and religious communities developed plans to remove clergy, but some priests chose to stay and minister to the people. From 1926 - 1929, 160 priests were executed along with hundreds more lay men, women and children. On the heels of the Russian revolution, there was a wide spread belief that religion was holding up progess. If only people could be liberated from God, the would be more devoted to improving their lot in this life. Even today, there is a popular belief that the real cause of war and misery is religion. Belief in God and practice of one's own faith is presumed to be irrational by many. But such prejudice proved prosaic when throughout the 20th century godless regimes showed impious men were the most inhumane men of all. The persecution of the Church in Mexico and the martyrdom of Padre Pro is part of this larger political story. Today, in the United States, even among some conservatives, there is the bizarre assumption that somehow men are better off without God. But whenever I look back on the sorrowful century we have just left behind us, I am baffled by this prosaic thinking. A lot of people like to assert that religion is the biggest cause of war and more recently 9/11 is gleefully pointed to as an example of how religion is. They like to ignore my complaints about the atheistic policies of genocide socialist countries have taken up – policies that led to the deaths of more people in a mere one hundred years than those put to death by any religious country in the last two thousand. The problem is never religion itself. The problem is irrationality – whether atheistic or theistic. Whenever human beings think that the end justifies the means – they do stupid things to each other. Religious people on the whole are more inclined to be rational than non-religious people. This is because people who believe in God know they are not him. Atheists are inclined to think because there is no God, they need to take his place. The story of Padre Miguel Pro is an example of how God-fearing people can help keep society rational. Tonight at St. John Vianney Theological Seminary, in Denver – our men are performing “Viva Christo Rey” a play about this man’s story. For those who think God stands in the way of the utopia they want to create – it would be good for them to familiarize themselves with what happened in Mexico in the last century. They just might realize that utopia does not exist – but God does and He helps keep society human.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Western Civilization and The Bells of the Church

One of the things I love about our seminary here in Denver is the Church bells.   They help me remember what is holy.  Our bells also remind me of over 50 bishops and 400,000 Catholics who have courageously let their voices be heard over the breach in ecclesial unity caused by the rash decisions of the board members and president of Notre Dame.   Just as our bells remind us that time is a sacred gift, the voices of the Church's shepherds and faithful remind America that Catholic institutions have a sacred mission, a mission that trumps prestige and fundraising, a mission to the poor and the defenseless, extending even to the most vulnerable of all: embryonic human beings.
 
There are many things at stake in this conversation, but one elephant in the room is the need for our society as a whole to rediscover the reason why we honor each other.   Our society has come to the point, has been there for some time, where honor is bestowed on celebrity which is not commensurate to any given celebrity's accomplishments.  The popular, the glitzy, the wealthy, the photogenic, the entertaining and even the merely amusing are all too often the objects of our praise.  We honor anything and anyone who has made a name for himself when we used to honor the reason someone had a name.  I think this is because a name brand sells more commercials than what we used to honor.  It is of our heritage however to honor the unrecognized generosity and heroism of our forefathers no longer present in this life, those who suffered defeat - even when our enemies, and the greatness of the least of our society.  This is what distinguished civilized peoples from the barbarians and why Rome associated itself with defeated Troy and cities are named for the Trojan heroes.  It is what stirs us when we read of the Maccabean Wars and the Christian martyrs. 
 
The greatest values of Western Civilization have always included defending what is sacred and what is vulnerable.   This was always seen as a sacred mission.  There is a noble self-interest in taking this up.   We protect the sacred and the vulnerable because we need such things in our lives.   The mission is great and it makes us great to take it up.   When we put our lives and reputations on the line to reverence what is sacred and protect what is vulnerable, our identity, our character is revealed.  Thus, we honor our heroes for their great sacrifices and acknowledge their accomplishments.  What is more, when we honor the virtues and achievements of others, the great cultural leaders of the West have traditionally understood that such public praise allows the whole society to participate in this goodness, even when the goodness was the noble courage of a bitter enemy.
 
A vestige of this part of our heritage peaks out every once in a while - like when we honored the pilot who saved all those lives by landing his jet in the Hudson.  It also survives in the Church and academic institutions.  Some Catholic institutions have bestowed honorary degrees and awards to members of society who represent certain defining values and accomplishments.  Insofar as they do so honorably, not only the graduates but the whole institution is strengthened.  A sense of noble purpose and moral goodness is manifest.  A ray of hope stirs the courage everyone needs rise up and engage the fray.  This is the reason for a commencement and for honoring our nations heroes at such occasions. 
 
But whenever this praise is falsely bestowed - whenever we honor someone who has not acted in an honorable fashion - such praise is empty of any value either for the person on whom it is bestowed or for any community who has bestowed.  It becomes a certain communal lie.  This is such a grave matter, such an important value of not only civilization and but also the Church, that one of the roles of a bishop is to protect Catholic institutions from falsely honoring someone. 
 
Sadly, Notre Dame attempted to step around its own bishop's authority and in so doing, breached its unity with the Church.   Harm has been done to everyone, to all Catholics.  But Notre Dame has hurt itself most of all.  In a few weeks, this Catholic institution will  honor a public figure who has ignored the definining cultural voices of our time on the most defining cultural issue. 
 
Mother Theresa, John Paul II, and Ronald Reagan all spoke out in defense of our society's most defenseless - directly appealing to American society in particular.  Their appeals meant something.  They struck a cord in the hearts of many.   Rather than embrace these voices and others like it by honoring them, Notre Dame will honor a leader whose words before the election and behavior while in office shows cold indifference to the most vulnerable.  Yes, he has tried even yesterday to soften his own jargon - but his words are not commensurate to his actions.   Such cold indifference to human life does not provide a ray of hope and will not really encourage graduates to take up the cultural struggle of the day.  Nevertheless, while the empty speeches ramble on, because of the courage of Bishop D'Arcy and his brother bishops and 400,000 other Catholic voices, some graduates will hear the booming tone of sacred bells and remember what is holy - their sacred mission.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Challenge to the Priesthood and the Courage of Seminarians

I work with seminarians, over seeing seven years of academic preparation of the priesthood.   Only about half of them make it through the whole process.  Most of them who leave go out believing God is calling them to something else.  Some who leave are discouraged and not sure what God is calling them to.   But I admire these young men.  In a world of banality and compromise, they found God's love and attempted to offer Him a gift of love in return.  Even those who did not become priests were part of a great enterprise -- the greatest endeavor of our culture and our time.  In years to come, we will see them as the real heroes - both those who go on into the priesthood and those others who go on to engage the world.

Sadly, most people do not value what these young men are trying to take up.   Many Catholics do not see what is at stake in the current cultural war - and that for such young men, our battle would be lost.  Such Catholics really do not see the greatness of what a vocation is.  For them, one social contract is as good as another, if thats what winds your clock.  Such Catholics honestly believe that it would be better if the Church were just a little more liberal about such things.  Unfortunately, their pragmaticism is poison for the rest of us.   They discourage young people from believing that we have something important to offer the world, and they are especially threatened when young people try to do something great with their lives - like speak up for the defenseless or to embrace a life of sacrifice for others.  Out of envy or ignorance, they make cynical quipts - fiery darts aimed at the heart.  We do not know the full extent of the damage this skepticism causes.  But we know it is not universal.  In the link below, statistics show that more than half the men entering the priesthood were discouraged by someone close to them along the way - but they did not let this hold them back.  They pushed on so that not only the Church but the world is blessed by their generosity.  http://tiny.cc/ojGgo.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »